Article View: comp.sys.workstations
Article #39Sun 3/260CXP versus HP-UX workstations
From: Ephraim Silverberg
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1988 17:16
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1988 17:16
26 lines
1506 bytes
1506 bytes
We are faced with a choice of getting either a Sun 3/260CXP or one of
HP 320SRX, HP 350SRX and HP 825SRX. From the literature, it seems
that the Sun 3/260CXP is comparable with the 350 with the 320 being
weaker and the 852 being twice as strong (though weaker than a Sun 4);
is this correct?
I would appreciate any input from people who have used these machines
regarding the quality of the HP-UX Unix system, the graphics quality
and speed and the computational speed (particularly floating point),
and any general impressions of user friendliness, learnability, etc.
Please reply by e-mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ephraim Silverberg,
Faculty of Biomedical Engineering,
Israel Institute of Technology,
Haifa, Israel.
BITNET : ephraim@techunix
ARPANET : ephraim%techunix.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu
CSNET : ephraim%techunix.bitnet@csnet-relay.csnet
UUCP : {ihnp4, allegra, rutgers}!psuvax1!techunix.bitnet!ephraim
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8802111716.AA29397@techunix.bitnet>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!techunix.BITNET!ephraimShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!techunix.BITNET!ephraim From: ephraim@techunix.BITNET (Ephraim Silverberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.workstations Subject: Sun 3/260CXP versus HP-UX workstations Message-ID: <8802111716.AA29397@techunix.bitnet> Date: 11 Feb 88 17:16:01 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 25 Approved: works@rutgers.edu