Thread View: comp.sys.workstations
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Mike Wexler
Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:07
Re: Comp.sys.suns.unmod
Author: Mike Wexler
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:07
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:07
29 lines
1843 bytes
1843 bytes
In article <1607@thorin.cs.unc.edu> davisy@DOPEY.CS.UNC.EDU (York Davis) writes: > a) posting via the moderated newsgroup is slow > -- the moderator lets messages sit around > too long before posting to comp.sys.sun. > b) moderated newsgroups cannot be read and > processed on an article-by-article basis with > rn and various other news-reading programs. > c) Many people, myself included, object to > moderation on principle and to the moderation > in comp.sys.sun in particular. >2) I suggest comp.sys.sun.unmod as a name for this group. Problem b is not because the newsgroup is moderated. It is because it is digest format. The are moderated groups that are not in digest format(comp.sources.unix,comp.compilers). I think problem a is at least partially due to the digestification. I remember the moderator say that he wanted to up the digest size so that he would catch up with his backlog quicker. I agree that digests are not a got format for USENET(they may be for mail/ARPANET). I therefore recommend that comp.sys.sun be "un-digestified". This should fix these two problems. I suspect the third problem would not be as bad if the first two are "fixed". I am also against have two groups for the same topic. I therefore recommend that if most people would like the list to be undigestified, they vote against a new newsgroup and for undigestification. -- Mike Wexler(wyse!mikew) Phone: (408)433-1000 x1330
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads