🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.xerox
Article #195

(none)

#195
From: Steve Skarupa
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 1990 14:43
48 lines
2485 bytes
Return-Path: <info-1100-request@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Received: from tut.cis.ohio-state.edu by sumex-aim.stanford.edu (4.0/inc-1.0)
	id AA15742; Wed, 18 Jul 90 07:14:45 PDT
Received: by tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (5.61-kk/5.900605)
	id AA20288; Wed, 18 Jul 90 09:53:00 -0400
Errors-To: info-1100-request@cis.ohio-state.edu
Received: from SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.EDU by tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (5.61-kk/5.900605)
	id AA20282; Wed, 18 Jul 90 09:52:56 -0400
Received: by sumex-aim.stanford.edu (4.0/inc-1.0)
	id AA15446; Wed, 18 Jul 90 06:55:05 PDT
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 1990 6:55:04 PDT
From: Steve Skarupa <skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
To: info-1100@sumex-aim.stanford.edu
Message-Id: <CMM.0.88.648309304.skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>

Return-Path: <xerox@pharmvax1.ab.umd.edu>
Received: from pharmvax1.ab.umd.edu by sumex-aim.stanford.edu (4.0/inc-1.0)
	id AB15174; Wed, 18 Jul 90 06:38:14 PDT
Message-Id: <9007181338.AB15174@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
Date: 18 Jul 90 09:29:00 EDT
>From: xerox@pharmvax1.ab.umd.edu
To: "skarupa" <skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>

>From:	PHVAX1::WINS%"<skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>" 18-JUL-1990 09:26:34.24
To:	XEROX
CC:	
Subj:	FTP etherpacket deallocation

Return-Path: <skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
Received: from sumex-aim.stanford.edu by pharmvax1.ab.umd.edu with SMTP ;
          Wed, 18 Jul 90 09:26:24 EDT
Received: by sumex-aim.stanford.edu (4.0/inc-1.0)
	id AA15059; Wed, 18 Jul 90 06:27:00 PDT
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 1990 6:26:59 PDT
>From: Steve Skarupa <skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
To: info-100@sumex-aim.stanford.edu
Cc: skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu
Subject: FTP etherpacket deallocation
Message-Id: <CMM.0.88.648307619.skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>

Problem: with Medley TCP/IP such that after every FTP request, the
(VMEMSIZE 'LISP) increases by 7 pages.  Thus, the vmem eventually fills
up.  By looking at the (STORAGE) results my guess is that some
Etherpackets are NOT getting de-allocated.  Is this a known FTP bug?
Merci.

Stephen Skarupa
skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <CMM.0.88.648398629.skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU!skarupa

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU!skarupa
From: skarupa@SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU (Steve Skarupa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.xerox
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <CMM.0.88.648398629.skarupa@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
Date: 19 Jul 90 14:43:49 GMT
Sender: welch@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: inet
Organization: Info-1100 Mailing List
Lines: 48