RE: [walls%ssl.span@Fedex.Msfc.Nasa.Gov: RE: Re: Standalone VP booting]

Article View: comp.sys.xerox

Article #608

#608

From: Eric Cooper x2947
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 1988 00:59

9 lines
798 bytes

Bryan,

 It seems to be machine dependent rather than Interlisp-D release 
dependent.  And, yes, it is extremely annoying.  When I first went over to 
1186s from 1108s, I asked about this "improvement" and was told that 
somehow there had been a small savings in hardware involved with this 
downgrade...oh well.

-eric

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8811072201.AA26394@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!RCCA.BBN.COM!ECOOPER

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!RCCA.BBN.COM!ECOOPER
From: ECOOPER@RCCA.BBN.COM (Eric Cooper x2947)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.xerox
Subject: RE: [walls%ssl.span@Fedex.Msfc.Nasa.Gov: RE: Re: Standalone VP booting]
Message-ID: <8811072201.AA26394@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 8 Nov 88 00:59:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: info-1100@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8