Article View: comp.sys.zenith
Article #800Re: Memory Parity Error
From: Robert Max Jackson
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1990 21:13
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1990 21:13
12 lines
898 bytes
898 bytes
Kent Phelps [Internet: kent@sun.ufnet.ufl.edu] writes:
The early Z-158 CPU boards have been infamous in developing intermittant
parity problems.
............................
Damn. 3 of 12 Z-158s I have (about 2 1/2 yrs. old) have
started to show intermittant parity errors in the past several months.
I thought we must be doing something wierd. This makes it sound as if
we should just consider it a lost cause and junk the memory boards
when the problem gets annoying. Is that true or is there another
reasonable course?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<23870006@acf4.NYU.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!husc6!cmcl2!acf4!jacksonReferences:
<1071@darkstar.ucsc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!husc6!cmcl2!acf4!jackson From: jackson@acf4.NYU.EDU (Robert Max Jackson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.zenith Subject: Re: Memory Parity Error Message-ID: <23870006@acf4.NYU.EDU> Date: 10 Feb 90 21:13:00 GMT References: <1071@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Organization: New York University Lines: 12