Re: Wyse160 vs IBMPC+Kermit

Article View: comp.terminals

Article #111

#111

From: Steve Williams
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 13:20

21 lines
1347 bytes

I wonder if some of the people here are really talking about a new
version of MS-Kermit as the emulation as opposed to other packages??

MS-Kermit is a near perfect VT100 emulation and I have never seen
anything run as fast.  Procomm for instance always messes up on
non-destructive backspace so I'm always having stuff disappear from
the screen.

Does anyone have any hard facts that anything else is faster or a
better emulation???

I have run 9600 on an xt with no dropped characters and 19200 on AT
and above with no problems.  It also now supports Telnet over ethernet
with clarkson packet drivers.

sdw
--
Stephen D. Williams    SDW Systems (513) 496-5223 Pager (513) 439-5428 VMail
Object Oriented R&D    Internet: sdw@world.std.com CIS 76244.210@compuserve.com
Source Distribution    By Horse: 10028 Village Tree Ct., Miamisburg, OH 45342
GNU Support            ICBM: 39 34N 85 15W

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr6.132048.29903@meaddata.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!meaddata!bugatti!sdw

References: <1992Apr6.141906.4545@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.terminals,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!meaddata!bugatti!sdw
From: sdw@bugatti (Steve Williams)
Subject: Re: Wyse160 vs IBMPC+Kermit
References: <1992Apr6.141906.4545@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
Sender: news@meaddata.com (Usenet Administrator)
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 13:20:48 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Apr6.132048.29903@meaddata.com>
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message