Article View: comp.terminals
Article #123Re: Wyse160 vs IBMPC+Kermit
From: John Stewart - IRD Project
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1992 22:40
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1992 22:40
57 lines
2986 bytes
2986 bytes
In article <1729@otello.sublink.org> venta@otello.sublink.org (Paolo Ventafridda) writes: >From article <29D69200.6E33@telly.on.ca>, by evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch): > >Why using a real terminal instead of a PC ? >You talk about Wyse, which is also what i use. > >1- Cost. A Wyse costs less then a 8088 pc. Marginal these days I think >2- Screen. Try using a pc monitor (b&w or colour) for 10 hours, > and then try using a Wyse. The only difference is that on a good, > hi-refreshed screen you don't loose your eyes. > You can buy a good monitor for PC, but it costs money. > See number 1-. I have seen Wyse terminals WY120/WY60 that lose brightness to the extent that the terminal is unusable within a few months. Tweaking an internal pot can fix this temporarily but a new monitor or terminal is the only real fix. The screen alignment on the majority of Wyse's is very poor. Some have a >5 degree tilt on the image. >3- Speed. You switch on your wyse, in 5 seconds you're ready. > A PC does not support emulation/baud rates/flow controls/gadgets/ > graphic the way a serious terminal does. Not Kermit, at least. > You need a serious communication program, which costs money. > See number 1- . >4- Keyboard. Wyse keyboards are super. PC keyboards are toys compared > to a Wyse one. You may find a very good keyboard around, but they > costs money. See number 1-. I am not to impresses with Wyse keyboard. Better than a really cheap PC one maybe but I've used some good PC keyboards. >5- Noise. No noise on a terminal. Lots of noise on a pc. >6- Breakdowns. No Wyse broke in the past 3 years. Two PC did. > One was a nice Compaq/33. > I have worked with ( am working with ) 2 large government department that have between them thousands of Wyse terminals. Power supplys catch fire regularly. :-) >A 'little' Wyse costs around 350$-400$. A Wyse 160, which is what >i am using right now, might cost twice as much. But that's because it does >a bunch of things (like two connection at the same time, switch with >ctrl+enter). >In any case, i personally think that the monitor is the most important >thing. I spend usually 10 to 12 hours in front of it every day. Last week >i spent 2 hours in front of a VGA monitor made by Compaq: i went home >with a terrible headache! Never more; i connected to the compaq a Wyse 185. > >Before buying a printer, get a terminal for your pc-based unix. >You cannot buy new eyes, you know ;-) > Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr1.224027.4634@sunwgtn.newzealand.sun.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!newstop!sunwgtn!newsReferences:
<29D69200.6E33@telly.on.ca> <1729@otello.sublink.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!newstop!sunwgtn!news From: news@sunwgtn.newzealand.sun.com (John Stewart - IRD Project) Newsgroups: comp.terminals,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Wyse160 vs IBMPC+Kermit Message-ID: <1992Apr1.224027.4634@sunwgtn.newzealand.sun.com> Date: 1 Apr 92 22:40:27 GMT References: <29D69200.6E33@telly.on.ca> <1729@otello.sublink.org> Organization: Sun New Zealand Lines: 57