5620s (Was Re: Brain-damaged Terminal Contest)

Article View: comp.terminals

Article #1496

#1496

From: Ray Trent
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1986 10:24

17 lines
1364 bytes

Speaking of the DMD5620 (which I think is a good terminak even though
we don't have the layers software running), does anyone out there
have layers running over an Ethernet LAN? 

We have this stupid arrangement of Ungerman-Bass NIUs as terminak
concentraters linked by EtherStrands. The problem (as I understand it...
I haven't hacked on this too much) is that the xt driver used by 
layers et al is assumed to have hardware flow control. Is there a 
way to get around this requirement? (We're working on getting a few
HFC lines working, but it would be nice if there was some way to
use software/no flow control instead)


-- 
"A journey of a thousand miles..."
					../ray\..
 (trent@csvax.caltech.edu, rat@caltech.bitnet, ...seismo!cit-vax!trent)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1219@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!cit-vax!trent

References: <1438@kitty.UUCP> <1140@mordred.cs.purdue.edu> <435@twitch.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!cit-vax!trent
From: trent@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (Ray Trent)
Newsgroups: comp.terminals
Subject: 5620s (Was Re: Brain-damaged Terminal Contest)
Message-ID: <1219@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: Fri, 21-Nov-86 05:24:23 EST
Article-I.D.: cit-vax.1219
Posted: Fri Nov 21 05:24:23 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Nov-86 07:46:17 EST
References: <1438@kitty.UUCP> <1140@mordred.cs.purdue.edu> <435@twitch.UUCP>
Reply-To: trent@cit-vax.UUCP (Ray Trent)
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message