Article View: comp.terminals
Article #1785Re: Wyse terminals
From: mdf
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1987 22:40
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1987 22:40
11 lines
981 bytes
981 bytes
In <4476@ncoast.UUCP> allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) writes: >And of course they had a chance to do it right with the 60, and didn't.... Brandon, What do you see as still being wrong with the WY60? I'm about to buy a half dozen of them and would like your opinion on the beast. I thought that the WY60 fixed all the stupidities of their earlier attempts. Any opinions on the WY99GT?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<39@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-cis!tut!mdfReferences:
<1894@encore.UUCP> <4476@ncoast.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-cis!tut!mdf From: mdf@tut.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.terminals Subject: Re: Wyse terminals Message-ID: <39@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: Mon, 7-Sep-87 18:40:57 EDT Article-I.D.: tut.39 Posted: Mon Sep 7 18:40:57 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Sep-87 06:17:46 EDT References: <1894@encore.UUCP> <4476@ncoast.UUCP> Reply-To: mdf@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu.UUCP (Mark D. Freeman) Organization: StrongPoint Systems, Inc.; Columbus, OH. (guest of Ohio State U.) Lines: 11