Re: SCO and the attribute byte

Article View: comp.terminals

Article #2045

#2045

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 1988 04:41

8 lines
904 bytes

In article <6957@ki4pv.uucp> tanner@ki4pv.uucp (Dr. T. Andrews) writes:
>Saying "sorry, but you really should have bought a different terminal"
>doesn't wash.

Sure it does.  There is no excuse today (and hasn't been for years) for
manufacturing a terminal that makes the programmer work so hard to achieve
such a simple effect, with less than satisfactory results even after all
that work.  This is a battle that should be fought with the pocketbook.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8126@brl-smoke.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!gatech!uflorida!umd5!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn

References: <38@wzlr.UUCP> <691@nod2sco> <6957@ki4pv.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!gatech!uflorida!umd5!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.terminals
Subject: Re: SCO and the attribute byte
Message-ID: <8126@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 19 Jun 88 04:41:14 GMT
References: <38@wzlr.UUCP> <691@nod2sco> <6957@ki4pv.uucp>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message