Re: AT&T 5620 questions

Article View: comp.terminals

Article #2544

#2544

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1990 16:17

13 lines
1085 bytes

In article <14223@s.ms.uky.edu> david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- a slipped disk) writes:
>Ages ago I had someone tell me they simply replaced the memory chips
>and everything just worked.

I think some newer 5620s already had faster timing chips on board,
so that chip didn't need replacement.

>Ages++ ago I tried using the official 1Meg upgrade to upgrade "my" 5620.
>Oops..  didn't work.  And we didn't try tracking down what was wrong.

It worked fine for us, on a couple of dozen 5620s.
Maybe you didn't ground yourself before working with the static-sensitive
chips?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <12178@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <19704@ea.ecn.purdue.edu> <14223@s.ms.uky.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.terminals,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: AT&T 5620 questions
Message-ID: <12178@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 19 Feb 90 16:17:59 GMT
References: <19704@ea.ecn.purdue.edu> <14223@s.ms.uky.edu>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Followup-To: comp.terminals
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message