Article View: comp.terminals
Article #936Re: Leaving terminals on
From: Mark Brader
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 21:53
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 21:53
24 lines
1573 bytes
1573 bytes
In a message whose header requested responses BY EMAIL, Thomas Y.C. Woo (tomfox@cs.utexas.edu) asks: > I have a question regarding terminals. I have noticed that most > terminals are always left on around the clock. I want to > know if this is in fact better for the terminals ... Since multiple "no" answers have been posted, I feel compelled to post this one also. Which is that *some particular models* of terminal are best left on. In particular, most of the terminals here at SoftQuad a few years ago were HDS 200's, and their power supplies would fail regularly. We did an experiment where we left all the terminals on all the time in half of the office, and the power supply failures stopped in that half and continued in the other half. We felt this was sufficiently conclusive to have all the HDS 200's left on all the time, and while the failures did not quite stop altogether, they became a lot less frequent. Terminals that do not have that sort of flaw, though, probably do better to be turned off. -- Mark Brader, Toronto "But I do't have a '' key o my termial." utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com -- Lynn Gold This article is in the public domain.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct14.215351.2971@sq.sq.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uunet.ca!wildcan!sq!msbReferences:
<ldkpm9INN4ho@lovelady.cs.utexas.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.terminals Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uunet.ca!wildcan!sq!msb From: msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) Subject: Re: Leaving terminals on Message-ID: <1992Oct14.215351.2971@sq.sq.com> Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada References: <ldkpm9INN4ho@lovelady.cs.utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 21:53:51 GMT Lines: 24