Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #1427Re: Word vs Ventura vs Framemaker
From: DImagin
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:00
44 lines
3005 bytes
3005 bytes
>> That said, I would never consider using Word or WordPerfect to publish a >> hundred-page, fully illustrated and indexed manual. That would be like >> trying to drive a nail with a pair of pliers: sure, you can do it, but who >> needs the aggro? >Oh don't say that, I have layouted several books with over 500 pages >(all fully indexed and with many illustrations) using Word for Windows 6.0 >and it is the easiest to use while giving you the most automatisms. >IMHO. I missed the first message, so I don't know what your platform is. I would never use Word on a Mac if I didn't have to. On a PC, word works well for many things. At the company that I used to work at, all of the writers used and (by and large) liked it. The product documentation that they produced came to thousands of indexed and crossreferenced pages. They particularly liked word basic, which let one write macros and perform quite elaborate transformations to your document. Word also interfaces with programs like Robohelp if you are making Help documents for the PC. One point - Word Basic is complicted and having a knowledgable guru around helps. What I most dislike about Word is its writing mode/layout mode dichotomy and the fact that many of its best features are tucked way way way down in obscure menus. If you want to write shorter long pieces or put together a magazine, or have a lot of graphics and custom pages, you might consider Pagemaker. It works well for that sort of application, and probably has much better graphic arts and separation abilities than Word. I have used it on a Mac, but only a little on a PC, so I can't compare it's ease of use to Word on a PC. I do use, and prefer, FrameMaker for almost all of my writing - both long and short (on a Mac). I like the frames and the modeless operation. Frame has very nice indexing, TOC generation, and subdivision of a long book into chapters. It will also produce hypertext documents and output to Acrobat. On the down side, it won't print 2-up and 4-up in any reasonable way, so I find myself printing to EPS and rearranging the pages in Quark (Mac, maybe try Pagemaker on the PC). If they would add macros (Mac), blue-lines, and inheritance between Frames, I would be a happy camper. Bruce Hubbard.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4fcffn$av6@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4eu4ik$124@www.tkna.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10fcfb,dbb599cf21b6de33 X-Google-Attributes: gid10fcfb,public X-Google-Thread: 116644,dbb599cf21b6de33 X-Google-Attributes: gid116644,public X-Google-Thread: 10a756,dbb599cf21b6de33 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a756,public From: dimagin@aol.com (DImagin) Subject: Re: Word vs Ventura vs Framemaker Date: 1996/02/08 Message-ID: <4fcffn$av6@newsbf02.news.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 138413620 sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com references: <4eu4ik$124@www.tkna.com> organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) reply-to: dimagin@aol.com (DImagin) newsgroups: comp.text.desktop,bit.listserv.techwr-l,comp.publish.prepress