Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #151Re: DTP Publications (was Re: 'Publish')
From: Roger Tang
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 1990 06:19
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 1990 06:19
10 lines
990 bytes
990 bytes
Can someone point me exactly in what areas the new PUBLISH makeover is intrinsically bad? I glanced over it at the newsstand, and while I agree that it was change strictly for the sake of change, I can't point out exactly what is BAD about it (aside from all the ads cramming into page space and sorta running counter to the new philosophy, such as it is....). I'm not being sarcastic; I just want to know for my own growing sense of layout and design.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2798@milton.acs.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!oregon!milton!gwangungReferences:
<8855@lindy.Stanford.EDU> <35850@cci632.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!oregon!milton!gwangung From: gwangung@milton.acs.washington.edu (Roger Tang) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: DTP Publications (was Re: 'Publish') Message-ID: <2798@milton.acs.washington.edu> Date: 11 Apr 90 06:19:30 GMT References: <8855@lindy.Stanford.EDU> <35850@cci632.UUCP> Reply-To: gwangung@milton.acs.washington.edu (Roger Tang) Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 10