Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #248Re: FrameMaker (summary)
From: Tom Scavo
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 1990 03:54
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 1990 03:54
119 lines
5385 bytes
5385 bytes
Numerous comments received in the last week prompted this
update. Again, thanks to all of you who contributed this
new information.
------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an overview of FrameMaker as seen by its users:
Strengths Weaknesses
auto-referencing table generation
integrated drawing tools limited drawing tools
picture import by reference picture positioning
auto-numbering (figs, etc.) super/subscripts
textual cross-referencing hanging indents
footnotes/endnotes footnotes/endnotes
automatic TOC and indices non-adjustable overbars
Book Building help system
wysiwyg equation processing equation formatting
multiple dictionaries user interface
multiple platforms limited file export
excellent tech support hardware hungry
page layout capabilities customizability
no outliner
bibliography support
------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see, not everyone's in agreement when it comes to
certain features. These and other points are discussed
below:
- FrameMaker's user interface is nearly identical across
platforms, and this accounts for the complaints about the
non-Mac interface. Also, some of the dialog boxes could be
better designed.
- The Mac version is supposedly a full implementation of,
say, the Sun version (which has symbolic math capabilities,
btw). All versions claim to be 100% file-compatible with
each other.
- Choice of file type when exporting documents is limited
(there is no TeX filter, for example), and one user reported
problems when porting a Frame document to a NeXT
workstation.
- Those who used Frame on a Mac had a IIcx or better. An
SE probably wouldn't cut it, although one person mentioned
that an SE/30 with a second monitor might be OK. In fact,
a 19" monitor appeared to be the display of choice (even a
full-page monitor is unable to accomodate all of Frame's
floating windows).
- From a practical point of view, 4MB of memory is probably
minimum, and one person reported a noticeable increase in
speed (when editing large files) on a Mac IIcx with 8MB.
- Whereas Word for example, is stable, FrameMaker on the
Mac is not. Several bugs were reported: 1) the drawing
tools; 2) search/replace; 3) importation of Word files.
- FrameMaker is generally more powerful than Word, but a
good number of people commented on FrameMaker's inability to
generate tables, a feature Word users typically boast about.
One person remarked that PageMaker (on the Mac) was the
closest thing there was to FrameMaker, but that PageMaker
had nothing like FrameMath (the name given to FrameMaker's
equation typesetting facility).
- Some users find Frame's built-in drawing tools adequate;
others find them lacking.
- FrameMaker's footnote/endnote capability was praised in
a few instances, but at least one person had the need for
additional formatting options (e.g., [19-21]). Frame also
has problems creating an accurate list of figures (or list
of anything, for that matter).
- How does FrameMath (equations, etc.) measure up? In
terms of output, the following inequality holds:
TeX > FrameMaker > Expressionist
Interestingly, reversing the sense of the inequality gives a
fairly accurate description of the ease with which
mathematical text is created in each program. (Does anyone
know how MathType fits into these equations?)
- Super/subscripts are not properly positioned. While
manual positioning on an individual basis is possible,
global adjustments are not. Horizontal spacing (kerning)
between the characters of mathematical expressions must be
manually applied in many instances. Multiple levels of
super/subscripts are not supported.
- Editing of mathematical expressions is difficult since
there are no visual cues (like the box outlines in
Expressionist) that would aid the selection of
subexpressions.
- Frame Technologies can be reached by email at
comments@frame.com
and demo versions of FrameMaker are available. Although
this offer does NOT include the Mac, a timed-out Mac version
IS available (at least for those in the educational
community) if you're willing to send the company seven
(count em!) blank diskettes.
- Supposedly, there is a review article in a recent issue
(sometime in the last couple of months?) of _Desktop_
_Publishing_ (or something like that).
------------------------------------------------------------
--
Tom Scavo <scavo@cs.uoregon.edu>
---------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Sep26.035438.21423@cs.uoregon.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!scavoReferences:
<1990Sep19.224520.9375@cs.uoregon.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!scavo From: scavo@cs.uoregon.edu (Tom Scavo) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: FrameMaker (summary) Keywords: desktop publishing equation typesetting Message-ID: <1990Sep26.035438.21423@cs.uoregon.edu> Date: 26 Sep 90 03:54:38 GMT References: <1990Sep19.224520.9375@cs.uoregon.edu> Sender: news@cs.uoregon.edu (Netnews Owner) Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon Lines: 119