Re: Interleaf vs Framemaker

Article View: comp.text.desktop

Article #273

#273

From: nils-peter.nelson
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 1990 18:52

4 lines
552 bytes


The issue referenced has 15 pages of comparisons of Interleaf,
FrameMaker and Ventura.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Oct25.185225.9214@cbnewsl.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!emory!att!cbnewsl!npn

References: <JONAS.90Sep26131837@his.se> <2118@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!emory!att!cbnewsl!npn
From: npn@cbnewsl.att.com (nils-peter.nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: Interleaf vs Framemaker
Summary: Seybold Report on Desktop Publishing, Vol 5, Number 2
  October 3, 1990.
Message-ID: <1990Oct25.185225.9214@cbnewsl.att.com>
Date: 25 Oct 90 18:52:25 GMT
References: <JONAS.90Sep26131837@his.se> <2118@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message