🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #392

Re: Publisher vs. Framemaker?

#392
From: Paul Kunz
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 1991 05:50
45 lines
2922 bytes
In article <1430@tekig7.MAP.TEK.COM> briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM (Brian D Diehm) writes:

   Path: unixhub!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekig7!tekig5!briand
   From: briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM (Brian D Diehm)
   Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
   Date: 22 Feb 91 22:31:49 GMT
   References: <1991Feb21.220957.23332@linus.mitre.org> <1991Feb22.213956.10496@cbnewsj.att.com>
   Sender: news@tekig7.MAP.TEK.COM
   Reply-To: briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM (Brian D Diehm)
   Distribution: usa
   Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
   Lines: 30

   In article <1991Feb22.213956.10496@cbnewsj.att.com> jwi@cbnewsj.att.com (Jim Winer @ AT&T, Middletown, NJ) writes:

   ]If you are professional writers, you won't like either Framemaker or Publisher.
   ]They are very easy to use for a novice, you just follow the menus. If you
   ]do something else for a living, this is ideal. If you write for a living,
   ]you will find that you have to follow the menus every time -- there are
   ]no shortcuts. It will drive you batty.

   ]You will also find that the integrated art is for amateurs too. If you are
   ]used to doing good art on your Macs, plan on driving your artists up a wall.

   ]In general, Framemaker and Publisher are good for projects where documentation
   ]is an afterthought. They are not compatible with people who write or draw for
   ]a living, but they are very good for engineers and supervisiors.

      ***********************************************************************
      *									 *	
      * This is, without a doubt, THE most ridiculous assertion I have EVER *
      * read on the net. And I used to subscribe to groups on politics.     *
      *									 *
      *									 *
      * Sheesh.								 *
      *									 *
      ***********************************************************************

   --
   -Brian Diehm
   Tektronix, Inc.                (503) 627-3437         briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
   P.O. Box 500, M/S 47-780
   Beaverton, OR   97077                        (SDA - Standard Disclaimers Apply)

I agree.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <PFKEB.91Feb22215005@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!yale!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!pfkeb
References: <1991Feb21.220957.23332@linus.mitre.org> <1991Feb22.213956.10496@cbnewsj.att.com> <1430@tekig7.MAP.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!yale!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!pfkeb
From: pfkeb@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Paul Kunz)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: Publisher vs. Framemaker?
Message-ID: <PFKEB.91Feb22215005@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 23 Feb 91 05:50:05 GMT
References: <1991Feb21.220957.23332@linus.mitre.org>
 <1991Feb22.213956.10496@cbnewsj.att.com> <1430@tekig7.MAP.TEK.COM>
Sender: news@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 45
Nntp-Posting-Host: ebnextk.slac.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM's message of 22 Feb 91 22:31:49 GMT