Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #438Re: Photographs to bits: how to proceed?
From: Diana Sparks
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1991 21:27
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1991 21:27
46 lines
2793 bytes
2793 bytes
In article <9103132030.AA21462@willow23.cray.com>, rice@WILLOW.CRAY.COM (Jonathan Rice) writes:
> Here's a novice question for you:
>
> I'd like to take a photograph of some people, and include it in a DTP'ed
> document. [stuff deleted]
>
> What I haven't a clue about is how to go from camera to disk. Do I shoot
> negative or positive film? If negative, do I work from the neg or from a
> print? If the photograph is in color, is it better to scan it in color and
> dither or halftone it on the 'puter, or to scan it as grey?
Well, depends on what kind of results you want, and how you are
going to have your DTP'ed doc printed. IF you are doing a 'quick-
and-dirty' rendition of a newsletter, etc., that you will have
offset printed/copied, and don't want to spend much $$, grey-
scale would be the way to go. You don't necessarily have to have
a black & white photo however. I recently used a color Polaroid
(yep, instant photo), scanned it in as grayscale on my Microtek
grayscale scanner, edited it in Digital Darkroom, and used it
in a publication. It looked just about as good as the 35mm
B&W stuff I have scanned. This was just a copied job, however.
Color and 3-color separations are a whole different matter, and
much too complicated to go into here. If you do want to
do color work, your best bet would probably be to find a print
shop that does computerized color work and let them do the
scanning, separations, etc., for you, and then have them
insert the file at print time.
> What sort of scanner should I be looking for?
There are some DTP services and copy shops that will do scanning
for a fee--any 8-bit grayscale scanner would do. Some do a little
better job than others; apple's scanners impress me more than the
Microtek I've got, but it is perfectly acceptable most of the time.
--
$ banner
<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>><<<<<
<><> Diana Sparks-->> diana@er.arco.com <><><
<><> "This is very simple: first you access your mainframe...
<><> or "on" to the computer illiterate." The Wizard: 'Shoe'.
<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>><<<<<
$
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Mar15.212744.5058@Arco.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucla-cs!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!know!cs.utexas.edu!helios!inetg1!inetg1!dianaReferences:
<9103132030.AA21462@willow23.cray.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucla-cs!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!know!cs.utexas.edu!helios!inetg1!inetg1!diana From: diana@er.Arco.Com (Diana Sparks) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: Photographs to bits: how to proceed? Message-ID: <1991Mar15.212744.5058@Arco.COM> Date: 15 Mar 91 21:27:44 GMT References: <9103132030.AA21462@willow23.cray.com> Sender: news@Arco.COM Reply-To: diana@er.Arco.Com (Diana Sparks) Distribution: usa Organization: Arco Oil & Gas Company Lines: 46