Article View: comp.text.desktop
Article #667Printing
From: Chuq Von Rospach
Date: Fri, 08 May 1987 17:55
Date: Fri, 08 May 1987 17:55
32 lines
2015 bytes
2015 bytes
Date: Thu, 7 May 87 10:45:45 edt
From: seismo!mirror.TMC.COM!rs (Rich Salz)
I would not buy photocopy equipment, because it does seem like you'll
eventually want/need to go to offset. I would find myself a good,
large-sized copy house. Sit down with them and explain your plans. A
smart rep -- not some bozo behind the counter who sticks pages in the
feeder -- can help you analyze and balance the trade-offs. Large
copy-houses also provide offset (part of my definition of large :-)
printing, collating, etc.
In general, I think offset wins when
# copies >> # pages
or if # copies is fairly large -- a couple of hundred. It seems to
need that kind of balance to average out the high set-up effort
needed for each offset "signature" (clump of four pages). [Okay,
it's not really a signature; I just don't remember the right term.]
On the other hand, if you're willing to hand-insert special sheets,
you can get full-color copies with photostat. Also, I've seen pretty
reasonable results from both the Kodak and Xerox "thesis-quality"
copiers by just placing a half-tone screen on the glass with your
contone or photograph.
/rich $alz
----------------------------------------
Submissions to: desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid@desktop-request
Paths: {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun
Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM [I don't read flames]
There is no statute of limitations on stupidity
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18408@sun.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuqShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Printing Message-ID: <18408@sun.uucp> Date: Fri, 8-May-87 13:55:33 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.18408 Posted: Fri May 8 13:55:33 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 21:15:06 EDT Sender: news@sun.uucp Distribution: comp Lines: 32 Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com