🚀 go-pugleaf

Date: Wed, 13 May 87 18:08:04 PST
From: korn@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Peter "Arrgh" Korn)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley

I used PageMaker 2.0 for the latest issue of my newsletter.  I was very
happy with it.  It was quite a bit faster than 1.2, was cleaner in feel,
did automatic hyphenation (nice), kerning (automatic), and allows you
to include 300dpi scanned images (from scanners like the DataCopy, which
I mentioned in a previous posting).

I also used MS-Word 3.0, to prepare the articles before I 'pasted' them
into PageMaker.  For my newsletter, I would NEVER consider using Word.
But it's an 8 page newsletter, with lots of 300dpi graphics on EVERY page
(talk about taking a long time to print!), and many different column widths
each page.

Are there any specific questions about PageMaker 2.0?

Peter
-- 
-----						  
Peter "Arrgh" Korn		         Hacker?  Me?  A hacker?  No, actually
korn@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU			 I'm a mac-er.  All's we do is
{decvax,dual,hplabs,sdcsvax,ulysses}!ucbvax!korn            make library calls.

----------------------------------------
Submissions to:   desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid@desktop-request
Paths:  {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun
Chuq Von Rospach	chuq@sun.COM		[I don't read flames]

There is no statute of limitations on stupidity