🚀 go-pugleaf

From: rokicki@rocky.stanford.edu (Tomas Rokicki)
Date: 8 Jun 87 22:52:39 GMT
Organization: Stanford University Computer Science Department

In article <20583@sun.uucp>, chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes:
> Yep, storing the dictionary is the heart of the problem.  There is a
> guy at Stanford who did his thesis on the subject.  I forget his name
> but his thesis is published, so people at Stanford should be able to
> locate it.  I'd wager that there is available software to demonstrate
> his thesis.  He found some pretty neat ways to compress the dictionary.

Please pick up a copy of Computers & Typesetting, Volume B, entitled
TeX:  The Program, by Don Knuth, published by Addison Wesley Publishing
Company.  I paid $34.95 for my copy.  You should start at section 919,
page 386, and read.

It describes an implementation of Frank M. Liang's hyphenation algorithm,
which is described more fully in Liang's PhD thesis from Stanford
University.  (If anyone wants a copy of this, mail me and I'll give you
details.)

The dictionary is not compressed; rather, patterns are found and used.
These patterns are amazingly regular and dependable.  An exception
dictionary is used for those few exceptions (I believe a few dozen have
been found.)

Please, anyone writing or considering writing a typesetting program,
consider using these algorithms.  They are fast, small, use little data
space, and *work*.  There is no excuse for the poor hyphenation so many
systems give you, and also no reason to have to put in hyphens by hand.
If you desire, you can rip the code right out of TeX, since the source
code is so available and readable; Don Knuth specifically allows this.

Also, when using systems with automatic hyphenation, please look over
the hyphens you are given and insure they are reasonable.  There are
many cases where a hyphen might be okay, except in that particular
case.  For instance,

	Automatic hyphenation systems used in auto-

Here the context and hyphenation leads the reader to expect the word
to be `automatic', but the word might be `automobiles', jarring the
reader ever so slightly.  There are much better examples, but none
spring to mind at the moment.

Liang's algorithm can be adapted to foreign languages fairly easily.
Some languages, such as German, which change the spelling of words
when hyphenated, can cause some difficulty.

So, here's a question for y'all.  How should eighteen be hyphenated?
Dictionaries disagree; I want explanations of your choice.  Neither
eight-een nor eigh-teen look quite right.  I vote for eight-teen, but
this violates accepted English hyphenation rules; this is one of
those words you should avoid hyphenating.

Bad hyphenation exists all over, and can be quite comical.  The text
`Introducing Artificial Intelligence' by G. L. Simons hyphenates vie-
wed.  That word, again, was viewed.  Took you a second shot to read it,
eh?  ``Logic Design Principles'' by Edward J. McCluskey abounds with
bad hyphenations; pick up a copy and look at a random page.  For
instance, `wav-eform.'

And, lastly, for the sake of Pete, do not break paragraphs into lines
a line at a time!

Sorry for the length; I get carried away.

							-tom

----------------------------------------
Submissions to:   desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop-request
Paths:  {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun
Chuq Von Rospach	chuq@sun.COM		Delphi: CHUQ

Now, where did my ex-wife put my Fairy Dust?