Re: Xerox 6085 vs. IBM AT vs. SUN 3/nnn

Article View: comp.text.desktop

Article #781

#781

From: Chuq Von Rospach
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1987 16:56

13 lines
1254 bytes

Date: Wed, 15 Jul 87 10:21:05 EDT
From: weiss@bigburd.PRC.Unisys.COM (Tom Weiss)
Organization: Unisys Corporation, Paoli Research Center; Paoli, PA

I have no experience with Xerox, but I can tell you that the Sun is
MUCH, MUCH better (not to mention more expensive) than the IBM AT for
desktop publishing or anything else you might ever want to do with a
computer.  The Sun is faster, runs Unix native, has Xwindows and NeWS
for graphics, and can run much larger software packages.
----------------------------------------
Submissions to:   desktop%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop
Administrivia to: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com -OR- sun!plaid!desktop-request
Paths:  {ihnp4,decwrl,hplabs,seismo,ucbvax}!sun

Technical Details

Message-ID: <23522@sun.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!think!ames!oliveb!sun!plaid!chuq
From: chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: Xerox 6085 vs. IBM AT vs. SUN 3/nnn
Message-ID: <23522@sun.uucp>
Date: Wed, 15-Jul-87 12:56:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.23522
Posted: Wed Jul 15 12:56:37 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jul-87 06:44:29 EDT
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Distribution: comp
Lines: 13
Approved: desktop-request%plaid@sun.com