Article View: comp.text.sgml
Article #408Re: desktop publishing vs. the old fashioned way
From: MICHAEL ROGERS
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 17:12
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 17:12
38 lines
2393 bytes
2393 bytes
In article <37239@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>, bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu (David E. Bernholdt) writes... > >This may sound a little funny, but it is not meant as a rhetorical >question... > >Most of the talk on this group is about SGML for desktop publishing, >online retrieval/searching of documents, etc. -- the common theme >being electronic. > >Do publishing houses (the kind that generate paper output :-) use SGML >yet? Obviously they're going to use some kind of markup language when >they put the document into production. Is it likely to be SGML? Will >it ever be? Can you ask a publisher for their book/journal/whatever >DTD in order to write your document using it? > >This is analagous to the recurring question on TeX newsgroups/mailing >lists -- which publishers/journals/etc. will accept a TeX document? > >If the answer is that there _are_ publishers using SGML, then I wonder >what their DTDs are like. Have they all adopted (say) the AAP stuff, >or (like in the TeX world) does everyone have their own? Obviously it >should be easier to standardize DTDs than TeX macro packages. > >You can stop laughing now, I'm done :-) >-- >David Bernholdt bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu >Quantum Theory Project bernhold@ufpine.bitnet >University of Florida >Gainesville, FL 32611 904/392 6365 I know that ACS is using SGML to produce Chem. & Eng. News. A fellow named Richard Love has given presentations re: SGML at recent ACS meetings. Their objective is to use the DTD to convert the text of C&EN to an online-searchable version of the journal. R. Love seems to be a big proponent of SGML, and they are promoting it as a std. for submitted MS, so perhaps he might have some ideas about DTD's that he would share w/ you. Sorry, I don't have an address for Love, but believe he is in Wash. D.C. @ ACS.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4OCT199212125192@watson.bms.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!stanford.edu!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!synapse.bms.com!watson.bms.com!rogers_mReferences:
<37239@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.text.sgml Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!stanford.edu!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!synapse.bms.com!watson.bms.com!rogers_m From: rogers_m@watson.bms.com (MICHAEL ROGERS) Subject: Re: desktop publishing vs. the old fashioned way Message-ID: <4OCT199212125192@watson.bms.com> News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1 Sender: news@synapse.bms.com Organization: Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute References: <37239@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 17:12:00 GMT Lines: 38