Article View: comp.text.sgml
Article #629Re: FrameBuilder
From: Alex Lange
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 13:17
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 13:17
40 lines
2609 bytes
2609 bytes
jrutledg@cs.ulowell.edu (John Lawrence Rutledge) writes: : In article <ROBIN.93Jan10111434@utafll.utafll.uta.edu> robin@utafll.uta.edu (Robin Cover) writes: : >The description of FrameBuilder's "SGML support" by Peter Cash is a : >major stunner, if it is accurate. The Fall issue of <title>Frame : >Focus</> had a lead article "Frame Joins Forces with Datalogics" which : >said, among other things: : > : > FrameBuilder provides full, native support for Standard : > Generalized Markup Language (SGML), a widely adopted ISO : > standard for document interchange. : : I got the some line from a sales rep at UNIX EXPO back in September. So I : arranged to become a beta test site. Unfortunatity I found out after : getting the product and the manuals, this "full, nativbe support" only : means it incorperates the concept of structure, but nothing more. : : FrameBuilder allows the user to define, in SGML like sematics, the structure : of the document. This structure definition contains all the basic operators : including inclusions and exclusions. The demonstrations at the Seybold Expo in San Francisco last Fall emphasized FrameBuilder's rules as "content models," but "better than SGML." : But even this violates the standard : in minor ways. The concept of "required elements" is not enforced, merely "noted" by red lines (as opposed to black) in FrameBuilder's presentation of a document's structure. This was justified by the representative as in keeping with the way documents are written. For example, you wouldn't want to force someone to compose the introduction to a paper before the body was written, would you? As for "native SGML support," I realized that was an untruth when I was told that documents are stored in Frame's binary format. Alex Lange | Everyone spoke of UNIX Technical Publications | an information overload, Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. | but what there was in fact was Sunnyvale CA USA | a non-information overload.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan12.131750.28407@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!iscnvx!langeReferences:
<C0pBBx.1wI@ulowell.ulowell.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.text.sgml Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!iscnvx!lange From: lange@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (Alex Lange) Subject: Re: FrameBuilder Message-ID: <1993Jan12.131750.28407@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> Reply-To: lange@lmsc.lockheed.com Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space, Sunnyvale CA USA X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4 References: <C0pBBx.1wI@ulowell.ulowell.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 13:17:50 GMT Lines: 40