Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #1044TeX under DOS
From: Michael Barr
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 13:53
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 13:53
49 lines
3054 bytes
3054 bytes
Several people think that TeX under DOS is unfeasible. I wonder what percentage of TeX users are doing just that. Some of my reasons for preferring TeX under a PC are: * A much better editing environment. * I don't ever have to deal with (Ugh!) Sun Microsystems. * It was relatively easy to install and use. As for arguments on the other side, yes it is nice to have a professional to install it and get it running, but it is much harder to do under unix than under DOS. Under DOS you don't *need* a professional, although that would be nice. As for speed, I have trouble believing the quoted figure of an hour and a quarter for 400 pages on a 386SX (presumably 16Mh). My tests suggest that a document with an ordinary amount of mathematics does about 20 ppm on a 386SX-16 and about half that on a 286-12. So 400 pages of ordinary stuff should take about 20 min. I had a book of 450 pages, that included some dreadful diagrams (and the machine quite visibly slowed down when it hit them) and it took an hour and change for 450 pages on a 286-12. But how often do you run a 450 page book? A 20 page paper took enough time to get a cup of coffee and I can live with that in order to have my favourite editing environment... Of course, if you can afford a 486-50, so much the better. You can get one around here with a decently large disk and more graphics than you really need for about Can$2500 and you don't need a professional to run it. Add a personal laser printer and you are in business. BTW, it is purely subjective, but my output on an HPLJ IIP is, if anything, slightly superior to that of our office Sun on a Sun printer. As for speed, a 486-33 is about the same, perhaps a shade faster, than a Sun SLC (with one user at the time I tested it). Thus I expect a 486-50 to be slightly slower than a Sun ELC, which is the same processor, I believe, as a Sparc 2. In the book mentioned above, there were some problems with size because between LaTeX, our macros (over 500), our labels (also over 500) and some bezier curves on a few pages, we were in danger of exceeding limits that at the time were built in to the TeX program itself. Now with large versions available, for example in emtex, these limits are no longer a consideration. In any case, the length of the book itself is of no consideration since TeX does it one page at a time. Unless you run out of space on the disk to store the output. But then the same or worse is likely to occur with any word processor and can also happen under unix^\tm with TeX. Michael Barr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9208071353.AA01721@triples.math.mcgill.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!noiro.acs.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!info-texShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!noiro.acs.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!info-tex From: barr@triples.Math.McGill.CA (Michael Barr) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: TeX under DOS Message-ID: <9208071353.AA01721@triples.math.mcgill.ca> Date: 7 Aug 92 13:53:10 GMT Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway Lines: 49 X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List