Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #12164DOC and afm fonts and GS.
From: Peter MacDonald
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1993 05:07
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1993 05:07
10 lines
1429 bytes
1429 bytes
When using Doc with non-roman fonts, the postscript generated looks horrible when displayed/printed with Ghostscript. I am using the afm fonts so that Doc uses PS metrics. Does anyone know why this is, or if there is a solution? Also, it seems the LaTeX like output of Doc could be reasonably be used as LaTeX with a few extra defined macros, etc. Has anyone ever tackled this? Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gnusenet1993Aug6.050703.14550@sol.UVic.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!ai-lab!prep.ai.mit.edu!gnulistsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,433069a5695afe73,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 10effc,1d17bd7d7b641514 X-Google-Attributes: gid10effc,public X-Google-Thread: 101a2b,433069a5695afe73,start X-Google-Attributes: gid101a2b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-08-06 07:30:58 PST Newsgroups: comp.text.tex,gnu.ghostscript.bug,comp.windows.interviews From: sanjuan!pmacdona@sol.uvic.ca (Peter MacDonald) Subject: DOC and afm fonts and GS. Message-ID: <gnusenet1993Aug6.050703.14550@sol.UVic.CA> Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, CANADA Date: Fri, 6 Aug 93 05:07:03 GMT Apparently-To: uunet!gnu-ghostscript-bug@sol.UVic.CA Distribution: world Approved: info-gnu@prep.ai.mit.edu Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!ai-lab!prep.ai.mit.edu!gnulists Followup-To: comp.text.tex,gnu.ghostscript.bug,comp.windows.interviews Lines: 11