Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #12172Re: Ideas for renaming non-GNU ispell
From: Geoffrey Kuenning
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1993 19:15
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1993 19:15
47 lines
3303 bytes
3303 bytes
This article contains some clarifications on issues that a lot of people have raised, and a status report so far. I have changed gnu.emacs to gnu.emacs.help, since gnu.emacs is a dead newsgroup. Use of gnu.emacs also causes many news systems to forward the article to gnu.emacs.announce which is not appropriate for this particular discussion. Several people have suggested that, since my version is in wider use and also derives from Pace Willisson's version, I should keep the name "ispell", and FSF should rename their version. If FSF wants to do that, it would certainly be an acceptable solution to the problem. They could even call it "gspell" or "gispell" without fear of confusion. I'm investigating that option, though as I said before, I personally believe FSF should have priority if they want it. A number of people have asked me, "why not integrate the two versions and distribute them all under the Gnu Public License?" There are a couple of reasons for this. First, integration is nontrivial; Pace Willisson and I discussed it a year or so ago and concluded that we didn't want to put out the effort. Second, I'm not personally convinced that the Gnu version has any significant features that are missing from my version, with the exception that it uses less memory for the hash table. (If I'm wrong, I'd sure like to hear about it). Third, and most important, I'm not willing to put my software under the GPL. Since my objections are basically political, I don't think this forum is the proper place to discuss it, so I won't go further than that here. People who wish to hear my objections (they're hardly original) are welcome to e-mail me. Actually, I don't understand why FSF feels a need to distribute their own version of ispell when there's already a free version out there. If the FSF wants to take my version and distribute it *without* putting it under the GPL, they are welcome to. It's the GPL I object to, not FSF. But that's their business. Okay, enough clarifications. Here are the leading candidates from the suggestions I've received so far: wspell (world spell) mspell (multi-lingual spell) panspell Votes and additional suggestions are welcome, preferably by e-mail. -- Geoff Kuenning geoff@maui.cs.ucla.edu geoff@ITcorp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gnusenet1993Jun3.191512.3249@cs.ucla.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!olivea!grapevine.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!prep.ai.mit.edu!gnulistsReferences:
<1993Jun2.184117.12151@cs.ucla.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,30a13649209f960d X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 103b8b,7ae018104f118dcf X-Google-Attributes: gid103b8b,public X-Google-Thread: 102b9a,30a13649209f960d X-Google-Attributes: gid102b9a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-06-03 17:02:38 PST To: gnu-emacs-announce@news.germany.eu.net From: geoff@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Geoffrey Kuenning) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex,comp.emacs,gnu.emacs.help Subject: Re: Ideas for renaming non-GNU ispell Message-ID: <gnusenet1993Jun3.191512.3249@cs.ucla.edu> Date: 3 Jun 93 19:15:12 GMT References: <1993Jun2.184117.12151@cs.ucla.edu> Followup-To: comp.text.tex,comp.emacs,gnu.emacs.help Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department Distribution: world Approved: info-gnu@prep.ai.mit.edu Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!olivea!grapevine.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!prep.ai.mit.edu!gnulists Lines: 48