Re: ANNOUNCE: GNU TeX 0.80 (beta)

Article View: comp.text.tex

Article #12212

#12212

From: Greg Lindahl
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00

16 lines
1022 bytes

seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) writes:

> Sorry... I just saw an argument I found particularly flawed, and felt the
> need to debate it.  I don't really care that much about the terminology - I
> just object to that rationalization for it.

The best part is that you are, at the same time:

1) complaining that rms is posting off-topic material to gnu.misc.discuss

and

2) continuing to cross-post this flamewar to comp.text.tex, when it no
longer mentions TeX in any way, shape, or form.

-- g

Technical Details

Message-ID: <78al91$638@news3.newsguy.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <hL3q2.240$NN.10560@ptah.visi.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,8971ce4fd62697b1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,6fdfa51164e34878
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
From: lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GNU TeX 0.80 (beta)
Date: 1999/01/22
Message-ID: <78al91$638@news3.newsguy.com>
X-Deja-AN: 435759648
References: <hL3q2.240$NN.10560@ptah.visi.com>
Organization: a guest of Shadow Island Games
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex,gnu.misc.discuss

Reply to Parent Message