🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug27.044102.24152@menudo.uh.edu> yzhao@cs.uh.edu (Yi Zhao) writes:
>I am trying to use SliTex To prepare a set of slides for a presentation.
>The materials are largely drawn from the paper written in LaTeX. I need
>to make citations and to include figures in my slides, which are nicely done
>in LaTeX by using figure and bibliography environments. The problem is I can
>no longer use the citations and figures in the same way as I did in LaTeX.
>For figures, I can print them separately, but as far as ciatation is concerned,
>I cannot figure out a better way other than manually put stuffs like [ABC 92]
>into the source SliTeX file. So, the question is:
>
>Is there a better SliTeX {sty, or, tex} that can handle figure and
>bibliography stuffs?
>
>Any advice is appreciated.
>
>Yi Zhao

I posted a similar query a few months ago. The consensus was that
slitex is unneccessary, and that you can do as well with a slide
style in latex and have all the other nice features of latex (as
well as not bother with slitex.fmt, etc.). There are several nice
slides styles out there - I chose lslide.sty because it is simple
and worked for me (and I like the shadow boxes!). There are more
complicated packages (seminar) but lslide does the basics quite
nicely. Both lslide and seminar are at niord.

Neal

-- 
Neal Beck 
Dept of Politcal Science, UCSD
beck@ucsd.edu
Dislaimer: The Regents pay me (in scrip?) to distribute my opinions!