Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #2258Re: "risky" PD software
From: Marc Bouron
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:30
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:30
17 lines
1329 bytes
1329 bytes
In article <1992Aug17.010336.4750@uwm.edu>, bruno@cerberus.csd.uwm.edu (Bruno Wolff III) writes: > From article <7796821@MVB.SAIC.COM>, by "Phillip E. Parker" <PPARKER@TWSUVM.UC.TWSU.EDU>: > > I don't understand: how is running PD software risky if the user has access > > to files he is not supposed to show to anyone? Specifically, why is it more > > risky than running Wordperfect etc.? > > > Running any software is risky. However I feel that commerical software > companies are less likely to produce code that has trojan horse code in it. Funny you should say that... In an article at the weekend in a most reputable British newspaper, it was alleged that some software houses were deliberately introducing errors and `time bombs' into their software, some simple, some malicious, in order to secure future "business" from their clients. (Extortion, basically.) [M][a][r][c]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug17.033022.273@hemlock.cray.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!marcReferences:
<7796821@MVB.SAIC.COM> <1992Aug17.010336.4750@uwm.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!marc From: marc@hemlock.cray.com (Marc Bouron) Subject: Re: "risky" PD software Message-ID: <1992Aug17.033022.273@hemlock.cray.com> Originator: marc@hemlock Lines: 17 Sender: marc@hemlock (Marc Bouron) Organization: Cray Research, Inc. References: <7796821@MVB.SAIC.COM> <1992Aug17.010336.4750@uwm.edu> Date: 17 Aug 92 03:30:21 CDT