🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1d5focINN56t@fbi-news.Informatik.Uni-Dortmund.DE>, heitkoet@lucky.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Joerg Heitkoetter) writes:
> In article <1992Nov3.001811.7414@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au>,
> Christopher.Vance@adfa.oz.au (Christopher JS Vance) writes:
> |> I have been asked to try to keep several different bibliographies
> |> within my thesis draft, one bibliography per chapter, and a separate
> |> overall one.  I'm using LaTeX, BiBTeX, and \include.
> Hmm, switch to \input and it works (see below).

Or, simply use the style written for this purpose: chapterbib.sty.
Available from all good TeX archives.

> Please stay tuned for "The Dungeons of BiBTeX revisited", an article
> I will post in the near future, that (hopefully) covers most of the
> currently floating BiBTeX questions.

Then you should add a hint to chapterbib.sty, which is both easier to
use and more portable (ie, it runs also on non-UNIX systems) than
your Makefile solution. (No pun intended.)
    Btw, does your ``Dungeons of BiBTeX revisited'' also present
something to have references in footnotes? With Opcit and Ibd
handling, depending on the page breaks?

--
Joachim

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Joachim Schrod			Email: schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
Computer Science Department
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany

	``How do we persuade new users that spreading fonts across the page
	like peanut butter across hot toast is not necessarily the route to
	typographic excellence?				-- Peter Flynn