Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #2433Installing TeX at a "secure" site?
From: Jim Graham
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 02:02
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 02:02
53 lines
3193 bytes
3193 bytes
In article <FRITZZ.92Aug14174337@ko.ldgo.columbia.edu> fritzz@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu writes: > Wasn't there a virus spread by legally sold software for the Mac? By > the way, an older version of GNU Emacs (which is running at the site > who requested that info) installed some program as setuid root by > mistake and created a major security hole. can't speak for the Mac bit, but I can say that some commercial software I got was quickly recalled by the company when they discovered that the machines that do their bulk copying were infected with a rather nasty virus. the copy I had checked out clean, but (obviously) they didn't want to take any chances.... people who insist on using only commercial software are simply being drawn into a false sense of security. it's as simple as that. yes, there are risks when using any software, PD, shareware, commercial, or anything in between. the solution is not banning such software.... the solution is a good backup strategy (this covers hardware failures, too). as for the problem of software containing security holes, compare the number of CERT advisories that deal with the commercial UN*X OS code to those dealing with software from the net. the higher visibility most certainly plays a role in this, but..... still, the worst security hole on UN*X systems is by far a combination of bad system administration and users who aren't concerned about security. on my workstation at work, which is already protected by a couple of firewalls, I frequently run (some via cron, some manual) checks on the system. I do things like checking for easily guessed passwords (I have the system hard-coded not to reveal the password that was guessed...just that it WAS guessed), .rhosts files, entries in /etc/passwd that shouldn't be there (like a user with a UID of 0, a user with NO password, etc.), and so on. gee, I've really gotten off the topic, haven't I? well, I've spent too much time here reading/typing news.....I suppose it's time to look at the other half of the newsgroups, then get onto something better, like the latest book I just bought to add to the long queue of books I want to read..... to the original poster: good luck. sounds like you'll need it. --jim -- Standard disclaimer....Ever since my cat learned to type, there's no telling whose thoughts these really are.... 73 DE N5IAL (/9) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ INTERNET: jim@n5ial.chi.il.us | grahj@gagme.chi.il.us | j.graham@ieee.org UUCP: gagme!n5ial!jim@clout.chi.il.us AMATEUR RADIO: n5ial@n9hsi (Chicago.IL.US.Earth) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<714103365snx@n5ial.chi.il.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!laidbak!tellab5!vpnet!serveme!n5ial!jimReferences:
<FRITZZ.92Aug14174337@ko.ldgo.columbia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!laidbak!tellab5!vpnet!serveme!n5ial!jim From: jim@n5ial.chi.il.us (Jim Graham) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: Installing TeX at a "secure" site? Message-ID: <714103365snx@n5ial.chi.il.us> Date: 18 Aug 92 02:02:45 GMT References: <FRITZZ.92Aug14174337@ko.ldgo.columbia.edu> Organization: Me? Organized? Hah! :-) Lines: 53