Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #2530Re: TeX In Practice
From: James Petts
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 12:14
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 12:14
18 lines
1197 bytes
1197 bytes
In article <ROLFL.92Aug20112635@karl.uio.no> Rolf Lindgren, rolfl@karl.uio.no writes: >Why hasn't anybody written a book explaining LaTeX? IMHO, the LaTeXbook >needs a companion volume far more than the TeXbook does. I tend to agree with you, but although there are a handful (3 or 4 ?) of LaTeX books around, I think that because LaTeX is perceived as "easier" than TeX, the books are generally not of the same standard. #include <disclaimer.h> James Petts ******************************************************************** * "We use the classical theory on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, * * and the quantum theory on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays." * ************************************** Wm. Bragg *******************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BtA7CB.3zv@gate.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!nuntiusReferences:
<Bt9wFC.xI@gate.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!nuntius From: James Petts <pettsj@visigoth.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: TeX In Practice Organization: No Affiliation Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 12:14:34 GMT Message-ID: <BtA7CB.3zv@gate.demon.co.uk> X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1 References: <Bt9wFC.xI@gate.demon.co.uk> Sender: news@gate.demon.co.uk (Usenet Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: visigoth.demon.co.uk Lines: 18