Re: Latest version of LaTeX

Article View: comp.text.tex

Article #2560

#2560

From: Lee Hetherington
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:22

8 lines
1035 bytes

Am I the only one who finds the non-increasing LaTeX version numbers
annoying?  What's the point of a version number if you ALSO have to
check the date?  Let's get rid of one or the other, preferably the
date as a means of version control.
--

                                Lee Hetherington
                                ilh@lcs.mit.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ILH.92Sep11092247@winnie-the-pooh.lcs.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ogicse!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!news!ilh

References: <1992Sep10.132051.7158@jet.uk> <92255.113255PERSKEF@DMSWWU1A.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ogicse!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!news!ilh
From: ilh@lcs.mit.edu (Lee Hetherington)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Latest version of LaTeX
Message-ID: <ILH.92Sep11092247@winnie-the-pooh.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:22:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: winnie-t.ILH.92Sep11092247
References: <1992Sep10.132051.7158@jet.uk>
 <92255.113255PERSKEF@DMSWWU1A.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
Reply-To: ilh@lcs.mit.edu
Organization: MIT/LCS Spoken Language Systems
Lines: 8
In-Reply-To: PERSKEF@DMSWWU1A.UNI-MUENSTER.DE's message of 11 Sep 92 11:15:01 GMT

Reply to Parent Message