Re: Two small conceptual mistakes in latex.tex with proposed improvement

Article View: comp.text.tex

Article #2658

#2658

From: Brian Junker
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 20:22

10 lines
973 bytes

I  have always been happy with \secdef, as described in the latex.tex source:

% \secdef{UNSTARCMDS}{STARCMDS} :
%    When defining a \chapter or \section command without using
%    \@startsection, you can use \secdef as follows:
%       \def\chapter { ... \secdef \CMDA \CMDB }
%       \def\CMDA    [#1]#2{ ... }  % Command to define \chapter[...]{...}
%       \def\CMDB    #1{ ... }      % Command to define \chapter*{...}

-BJ

Technical Details

Message-ID: <weZe81S00j4eJ_dEVB@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!udel!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!bj20+

References: <1992Aug22.162013.1073@prl.philips.nl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Organization: Statistics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!udel!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!bj20+
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Message-ID: <weZe81S00j4eJ_dEVB@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 16:22:25 -0400 
From: Brian Junker <bj20+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Two small conceptual mistakes in latex.tex with proposed improvement
In-Reply-To: <1992Aug22.162013.1073@prl.philips.nl>
References: <1992Aug22.162013.1073@prl.philips.nl>
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message