Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #276Re: Serbian language
From: George Bogavac
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:15
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:15
50 lines
3013 bytes
3013 bytes
In article <498@owl.ukc.ac.uk> dat@ukc.ac.uk (D.A.Turner) writes: >In response to a reference to a message about "Serbian" (language) I wrote: >>That's interesting - I wasn't previously aware of a language called Serbian. >>I had been told it was called Serbo-Croat. > >To which victor@jezebel.wustl.edu (Victor Wickerhauser) replies: >>I think it is reasonable to distinguish a language written in one alphabet >>from one written in another. > >I see, so when Serbo-Croat is written in Cyrillic you call it Serbian, >when in the Roman alphabet you call it Croat. Sounds rather silly to >me. Is English a different language when I use shorthand to write it >down? > >The "instructions" referred to (and included) in the message about fonts >were in the ROMAN alphabet - so how could they be in Serbian? According >to your formulation they were in Croat! >. Before this gets out of hand, allow me to add my two cents worth: The language spoken in the majority of ex-YU republics (Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina,Montenegro & Serbia ) is essentially the same language, meaning that people from these republics can communicate without any problems. There are different dialects, and some differences in vocabulary, but again, these differences are minor. The grammar (including spelling) is the same. One of the outstanding "features" of the language is that it can be written using two alphabets - the latin alphabet and the Cyrillic alphabet. Due to historical circumstances, the latin alphabet is nowadays used primarily in the western parts, and the Cyrillic alphabet in the eastern parts. It is incorrect to call the language Serbian just because it is written in the Cyrillic alphabet, just as it is incorrect to call it Croatian just because it is written in the Roman, or latin alphabets. During the communist rule, the official name of the language was "Srpskohrvatski" or "Hrvatskosrpski" (Serbo-Croatian or Croatian- Serbian). Nationalists prefer to call it Serbian (Serbs) or Croatian (Croats). It is *esentially* the same language, but we have to respect each nations right to call it how they wish. So you can write either "CBAKu CP6uH CEPE CE6E" or "SVAKI SRBIN SERE SEBE". Likewise, you can write: "VIKTOR JEDE GOVNA" or "BuKTOP JEgE TOBHA". You see, it's not the spelling that matters, as long as the message gets through. ( All references to real Serbs or Victors is totally unintentional :-) George Bogavac.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<21JUL92.12161453.0212@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!tulane!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!torn!csd.unb.ca!UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CAReferences:
<19230@plains.NoDak.edu> <497@owl.ukc.ac.uk> <1992Jul21.025607.1580@wuecl.wustl.edu> <498@owl.ukc.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!tulane!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!torn!csd.unb.ca!UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA From: K2GT@UNB.CA (George Bogavac) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex,soc.culture.yugoslavia Subject: Re: Serbian language Message-ID: <21JUL92.12161453.0212@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA> Date: 21 Jul 92 15:15:38 GMT References: <19230@plains.NoDak.edu> <497@owl.ukc.ac.uk> <1992Jul21.025607.1580@wuecl.wustl.edu> <498@owl.ukc.ac.uk> Sender: usenet@UNB.CA Organization: University of New Brunswick Lines: 50