Re: Suitability of TeX/LaTex for producing camera-ready manuscripts

Article View: comp.text.tex

Article #588

#588

From: petrovic
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 15:31

14 lines
950 bytes

I'm going to take some constructive criticism in public (something I don't
enjoy).  For lack of a question mark in the referenced subject line, it
has been pointed out that the nature of my problem is unclear.
I ask:  IS TeX/PicTeX a good tool for
the demanding technical user to employ in the production of 10-20 page
technical manuscripts which must be camera-ready at the publisher?
If not, are there any truly robust TeX-based alternatives?

Regretting the confusion,

Mark Petrovic
IBM Research
Yorktown Heights, NY
Disclaimed.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7572885@MVB.SAIC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!info-tex

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!info-tex
From: petrovic@watson.ibm.com
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Suitability of TeX/LaTex for producing camera-ready manuscripts
Message-ID: <7572885@MVB.SAIC.COM>
Date: 30 Jul 92 15:31:31 GMT
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
Lines: 14
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List