Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #918Re: Strange (incorrect??) tabular behaviour in LaTeX
From: Rainer Schoepf
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 09:10
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 09:10
62 lines
2817 bytes
2817 bytes
In article <1992Aug6.042914.24864@newshost.anu.edu.au> sjm@merlin.anu.edu.au (Stephen Meatheringham) writes:
I am running LaTeX Version 2.09 <7 Dec 1989>, with TeX, C Version 3.14t3 on
a Sun SPARCstation.
I have the following LaTeX file which is a very stripped down version of a
table, and the alignment of the columns is extremely weird - and as far as I am concerned is
wrong (well at least it is not what I'd expect!).
The file is :
\documentstyle{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
\multicolumn{3}{c}{this-is-a-very-long-word}\\
I & V & H \\
2.2 & 1.9 & 5.2 \\
1.7 & 2.0 & 2.8 \\
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
Now, what I see is that the 3 output columns (I, V and H) are not spread
evenly under the heading, but there is a lot more space between the V and H
columns than between the I and V columns. It makes no difference if the
multicolumn above is one word or a number of words.
Does anyone have any ideas how to force equal spacing between the columns?
And can anyone tell me why it doesn't do what I expect it should??
That's a feature of TeX, not of LaTeX. To understand why this happens
you have to carefully read the section in the TeXbook where the
calculation of column widths is explained. In short, in a situation
like yours, where there is material spanning more than one column, all
the excess width is assigned to the last column.
You might try the following:
\documentstyle{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
\multicolumn{4}{c}{this-is-a-very-long-word}\\
I & V & H \\
2.2 & 1.9 & 5.2 \\
1.7 & 2.0 & 2.8 \\
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
--
Rainer Schoepf
Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum ,,Ich mag es nicht, wenn
fuer Informationstechnik Berlin sich die Dinge so frueh
Heilbronner Strasse 10 am Morgen schon so
W-1000 Berlin 31 dynamisch entwickeln!''
Federal Republic of Germany
<Schoepf@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de> or <Schoepf@sc.ZIB-Berlin.dbp.de>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SCHOEPF.92Aug6101032@quattro.sc.ZIB-Berlin.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!zrz.tu-berlin.de!math.fu-berlin.de!gibb.math.fu-berlin.de!SchoepfReferences:
<1992Aug6.042914.24864@newshost.anu.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!zrz.tu-berlin.de!math.fu-berlin.de!gibb.math.fu-berlin.de!Schoepf From: Schoepf@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Rainer Schoepf) Subject: Re: Strange (incorrect??) tabular behaviour in LaTeX In-Reply-To: sjm@merlin.anu.edu.au's message of Thu, 6 Aug 92 04:29:14 GMT Message-ID: <SCHOEPF.92Aug6101032@quattro.sc.ZIB-Berlin.de> Sender: news@math.fu-berlin.de (Math Department) Reply-To: Schoepf@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de Organization: Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum fuer Informationstechnik Berlin References: <1992Aug6.042914.24864@newshost.anu.edu.au> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1992 09:10:32 GMT Lines: 62