🚀 go-pugleaf

Hello out there!
I have some seen some strange result of the \cite macros in a tabular
environment. Have a look at the following lines:

\documentstyle{amsart}
\begin{document}
This is a test for centering citations in tabular environment.


\begin{tabular}{|l|c|r|}
left & center & right\\
\cite{foo} & \cite{bar} & \cite{gnat}\\\hline
A\cite{foo} & B\cite{bar} & C\cite{gnat}\\\hline
\end{tabular}

\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{foo} Trulala.
\bibitem{bar} Show me the way to the next whiskey bar.
\bibitem{gnat} Journal of...
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}

Compile them with AMSLaTeX and wonder!
If I use article instead of amsart, everything works fine.

The problem is the macro \@cite#1#2. It makes use of \rom in amsart.

How can I avoid the problems, but make use of the advantages of the
new \@cite macro?

Greetings         Elmar
-- 
Elmar Schal"uck                   email: elmar@uni-paderborn.de
Uni-GH Paderborn                  phone: ..49-5251-602621
FB 17