🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #942

Re: The possibility of almost WYSIWYG TeX

#942
From: Mats G L|fdahl
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 08:58
44 lines
3136 bytes
Jeremy Gibbons writes:

   Hmm. OK, most of the time there is exactly one corresponding spot. What if
   the piece of text was produced by a macro (eg, I click on the `T' of
   `LaTeX') though---do I want to go to the macro definition, or to the macro
   call? I reckon it should be call here, but if I click on the body of a
   footnote I want to go to the `definition' (somewhere in the argument to
   \footnote) rather than the `call' (the occurrence of the \footnote itself).
   And what happens when I click on a page number or a running header?

For the \LaTeX macro, I'd always want to move to the call, possibly
replacing it with another macro call. Perhaps I wanted it to be a call
to \TeX instead. If I wanted to typeset "LaTeX", but a bit differently
than what comes out of the \LaTeX macro, I would go into the other
window, move to the preamble, define another macro, and replace the
call to \LaTeX with a call to the new macro. This replacement, I could
then make in either of the two windows!

It would be a bit more complicated, though, when you have a macro with
parameters. Do I want another macro or do I want to change (one of)
the parameter(s)? Perhaps, if you click on the text of a footnote, you
should go to the parameter of the \footnote call. Then a button would
move you to the actual "\footnote" string?

Or else, it might be easier to go to the TeX source window! I'm not
trying to *force* the user to *always* use the wysiwyg approach. I
like TeX and I dislike traditional wysiwyg because I can do so much
more with the TeX controll sequences. You all know these advantages of
TeX. What I'm saying is that there might be situations where a wysiwyg
approach is better, and that it would be an improvement to TeX if you
always had the choice!

	/Mats


--
 Mats Lofdahl, Stockholm Observatory, S-133 36 Saltsjobaden | +46 - 8 16 44 75 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Internet: lofdahl@astro.su.se | Bitnet: grodan@sekth | Sunet: royacs::lofdahl
-- 
 Mats Lofdahl, Stockholm Observatory, S-133 36 Saltsjobaden | +46 - 8 16 44 75 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Internet: lofdahl@astro.su.se | Bitnet: grodan@sekth | Sunet: royacs::lofdahl
Technical Details
Message-ID: <GRODAN.92Apr10095813@cyklop.nada.kth.se>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!cyklop.nada.kth.se!grodan
References: <1992Apr6.024326.1374@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <GRODAN.92Apr7122044@cyklop.nada.kth.se> <1992Apr8.031655.590@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <1992Apr8.125208.23444@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Apr9.033222.3037@cs.aukuni.ac.nz>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!cyklop.nada.kth.se!grodan
From: grodan@cyklop.nada.kth.se (Mats G L|fdahl)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: The possibility of almost WYSIWYG TeX
Message-ID: <GRODAN.92Apr10095813@cyklop.nada.kth.se>
Date: 10 Apr 92 08:58:13 GMT
References: <1992Apr6.024326.1374@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <GRODAN.92Apr7122044@cyklop.nada.kth.se>
 <1992Apr8.031655.590@cs.aukuni.ac.nz>
 <1992Apr8.125208.23444@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu>
 <1992Apr9.033222.3037@cs.aukuni.ac.nz>
Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 44
In-Reply-To: jeremy@cs.aukuni.ac.nz's message of 9 Apr 92 03:32:22 GMT
Originator: grodan@cyklop.nada.kth.se
Nntp-Posting-Host: cyklop.nada.kth.se