Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #942Re: The possibility of almost WYSIWYG TeX
From: Mats G L|fdahl
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 08:58
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 08:58
44 lines
3136 bytes
3136 bytes
Jeremy Gibbons writes: Hmm. OK, most of the time there is exactly one corresponding spot. What if the piece of text was produced by a macro (eg, I click on the `T' of `LaTeX') though---do I want to go to the macro definition, or to the macro call? I reckon it should be call here, but if I click on the body of a footnote I want to go to the `definition' (somewhere in the argument to \footnote) rather than the `call' (the occurrence of the \footnote itself). And what happens when I click on a page number or a running header? For the \LaTeX macro, I'd always want to move to the call, possibly replacing it with another macro call. Perhaps I wanted it to be a call to \TeX instead. If I wanted to typeset "LaTeX", but a bit differently than what comes out of the \LaTeX macro, I would go into the other window, move to the preamble, define another macro, and replace the call to \LaTeX with a call to the new macro. This replacement, I could then make in either of the two windows! It would be a bit more complicated, though, when you have a macro with parameters. Do I want another macro or do I want to change (one of) the parameter(s)? Perhaps, if you click on the text of a footnote, you should go to the parameter of the \footnote call. Then a button would move you to the actual "\footnote" string? Or else, it might be easier to go to the TeX source window! I'm not trying to *force* the user to *always* use the wysiwyg approach. I like TeX and I dislike traditional wysiwyg because I can do so much more with the TeX controll sequences. You all know these advantages of TeX. What I'm saying is that there might be situations where a wysiwyg approach is better, and that it would be an improvement to TeX if you always had the choice! /Mats -- Mats Lofdahl, Stockholm Observatory, S-133 36 Saltsjobaden | +46 - 8 16 44 75 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet: lofdahl@astro.su.se | Bitnet: grodan@sekth | Sunet: royacs::lofdahl -- Mats Lofdahl, Stockholm Observatory, S-133 36 Saltsjobaden | +46 - 8 16 44 75 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet: lofdahl@astro.su.se | Bitnet: grodan@sekth | Sunet: royacs::lofdahl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<GRODAN.92Apr10095813@cyklop.nada.kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!cyklop.nada.kth.se!grodanReferences:
<1992Apr6.024326.1374@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <GRODAN.92Apr7122044@cyklop.nada.kth.se> <1992Apr8.031655.590@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <1992Apr8.125208.23444@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Apr9.033222.3037@cs.aukuni.ac.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!cyklop.nada.kth.se!grodan From: grodan@cyklop.nada.kth.se (Mats G L|fdahl) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: Re: The possibility of almost WYSIWYG TeX Message-ID: <GRODAN.92Apr10095813@cyklop.nada.kth.se> Date: 10 Apr 92 08:58:13 GMT References: <1992Apr6.024326.1374@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <GRODAN.92Apr7122044@cyklop.nada.kth.se> <1992Apr8.031655.590@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> <1992Apr8.125208.23444@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu> <1992Apr9.033222.3037@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet) Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 44 In-Reply-To: jeremy@cs.aukuni.ac.nz's message of 9 Apr 92 03:32:22 GMT Originator: grodan@cyklop.nada.kth.se Nntp-Posting-Host: cyklop.nada.kth.se