🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #960

Re: Can pc users benefit from DosTex? -> No

#960
From: Richard Caley
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 20:36
26 lines
1558 bytes
In article <1992Aug6.145632.1355@id.dth.dk>, Erik Plesner (ep) writes:

ep> o Ethnic leters almost never translate correctly when files are moved to
ep> workstations/mainframes at the department.

I don't understand how this can ever be a problem, slot X in a
Computer Modern font will be a given character on any platform,
surely? If it's a probem of the (La)TeX input text being displayed (eg
in your editor) differently on different platforms, that is going to
be a problem with any system. 

ep> o Inconveniences of moving .ps files to dept. computers for printing on 
ep> good printers.

Again, this is a general PC problem unless they are networked well
enough to be able to talk to, for instance, the unix printer spooler. 

ep> o Runs out of space when documents reaches a reasonable size.

What a combination, DOS memory brain damage and TeX memory brain
damage at one and the same time :-).

--
rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk	Me? The only thing I ever ran on a PC
			which wasn't excrutiatingly painful was
			688 Attack Sub. 	
Technical Details
Message-ID: <RJC.92Aug6213611@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!edcogsci!cogsci!rjc
References: <1992Aug04.235021.1349@disk.uucp> <1992Aug6.145632.1355@id.dth.dk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!edcogsci!cogsci!rjc
From: rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Caley)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Can pc users benefit from DosTex? -> No
Message-ID: <RJC.92Aug6213611@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 6 Aug 92 20:36:11 GMT
References: <1992Aug04.235021.1349@disk.uucp> <1992Aug6.145632.1355@id.dth.dk>
Sender: rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
Organization: Human Communication Research Center
Lines: 26
In-reply-to: ep@id.dth.dk's message of 6 Aug 92 14:56:32 GMT