Article View: comp.text.tex
Article #588Re: Suitability of TeX/LaTex for producing camera-ready manuscripts
From: petrovic
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 15:31
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 15:31
14 lines
950 bytes
950 bytes
I'm going to take some constructive criticism in public (something I don't enjoy). For lack of a question mark in the referenced subject line, it has been pointed out that the nature of my problem is unclear. I ask: IS TeX/PicTeX a good tool for the demanding technical user to employ in the production of 10-20 page technical manuscripts which must be camera-ready at the publisher? If not, are there any truly robust TeX-based alternatives? Regretting the confusion, Mark Petrovic IBM Research Yorktown Heights, NY Disclaimed.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7572885@MVB.SAIC.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!info-texShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!info-tex From: petrovic@watson.ibm.com Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: Re: Suitability of TeX/LaTex for producing camera-ready manuscripts Message-ID: <7572885@MVB.SAIC.COM> Date: 30 Jul 92 15:31:31 GMT Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway Lines: 14 X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List