Article View: comp.text
Article #1453Re: TeX EditoR ?
From: Hylton Boothroyd
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1990 11:47
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1990 11:47
22 lines
1482 bytes
1482 bytes
In article <2147@alpha.cam.nist.gov> koontz@cam.nist.gov (John E. Koontz X5180) writes:
> In article <365@clover.warwick.ac.uk>, bsrdp@warwick.ac.uk (Hylton Boothroyd) writes:
> >
> > An alternative is to save the documents formatted, and to strip the
> > formatting information before feeding to the screen/printer display
> > programmes. I messed around with that for a while when I first installed
> > Microsoft Word 3.1, ...
>
> If you are going to mess around with ad hoc extraction processes it is
> easier to start with a word processor that records its formatting
> information in clear ASCII, like XyWrite, Nota Bene, or, I think, Word
> Perfect.
Perhaps I should have also said that in that version of Word, the formatted
file has a simple structure:
i) 128 byte header, with identifying byte and address of start of
part (iii);
ii) visible text;
iii) all format information.
So for input to TeX/LaTeX all that I needed was to trim off (i) and (iii).
Hylton
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<366@clover.warwick.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!warwick!bsrdpReferences:
<232@netdev.UUCP> <365@clover.warwick.ac.uk> <2147@alpha.cam.nist.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!warwick!bsrdp From: bsrdp@warwick.ac.uk (Hylton Boothroyd) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: TeX EditoR ? Keywords: Question on editor Message-ID: <366@clover.warwick.ac.uk> Date: 15 Jan 90 11:47:32 GMT References: <232@netdev.UUCP> <365@clover.warwick.ac.uk> <2147@alpha.cam.nist.gov> Reply-To: bsrdp@warwick.ac.uk (Hylton Boothroyd) Organization: Warwick Business School Lines: 22