Re: Troff -> Tex?

Article View: comp.text

Article #2792

#2792

From: Wm E Davidsen Jr
Date: Thu, 09 May 1991 13:10

6 lines
755 bytes

Sorry to say, I haven't heard of it. But then, why would anyone want to
change? It's TeX to troff we need, right? ;-)
-- 
bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)
        "Most of the VAX instructions are in microcode,
         but halt and no-op are in hardware for efficiency"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3409@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!rpi!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen

References: <7449@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!rpi!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen
From: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: Troff -> Tex?
Message-ID: <3409@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Date: 9 May 91 13:10:22 GMT
References: <7449@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corp R&D Center, Schenectady NY
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message