Article View: comp.text
Article #3032Re: Frame vs. Interleaf vs. ?
From: Mark Lawrence
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 17:03
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 17:03
11 lines
1001 bytes
1001 bytes
In article <1991Jun28.030953.9094@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca> davecb@nexus.yorku.ca (David Collier-Brown) writes: > I'm an Interleaf bigot: I found Frame more elegant and faster to learn, but >harder to do difficult things with (like *!#@$@^!!! tables) I'm a frame bigot: Frame 3.0 (shipping now for Suns running Sunview and shortly for platforms running X) reportably handles tables with the same aplomb as paragraph formats. -- mark@drd.com mark@jnoc.go.jp $B!J%^!<%/!&%i%l%s%9!K(B Nihil novum sub solem
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun28.170300.20981@drd.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!caen!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!apctrc!drd!markReferences:
<1991Jun21.130202.17852@compu.com> <68@tdatirv.UUCP> <1991Jun28.030953.9094@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!caen!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!apctrc!drd!mark From: mark@drd.com (Mark Lawrence) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Frame vs. Interleaf vs. ? Message-ID: <1991Jun28.170300.20981@drd.com> Date: 28 Jun 91 17:03:00 GMT References: <1991Jun21.130202.17852@compu.com> <68@tdatirv.UUCP> <1991Jun28.030953.9094@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca> Distribution: na Organization: DRD Corporation Lines: 11