Article View: comp.text
Article #3206Re: edt or vi?
From: Robert Cray
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1986 06:31
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1986 06:31
59 lines
2929 bytes
2929 bytes
In article <241@tellab5.UUCP> etan@tellab3.UUCP (Nate Stelton) writes:
>
>
>I am a UNIX/vi user who was recently told about EDT (under VMS), and I would
>like to solicit some comments. What I'm wondering is:
>
>1. Is EDT a superior text editor to vi?
No. VI has many things EDT does not, regular expressions,
the g & v commands, conditional replacement, the undo command,
and lots more. EDT does not really do anything.
If you want to use an editor under VMS, you should you EDIT/TPU
This editor has multiple windows, the ability to execute commands
on a buffer, and can be extended. It does not have regular exp.
built in, but has the functions needed to build it yourself.
Better still would be to use GNU emacs, it is free, runs on lots
of machines, and there are lots of people working on different
modes, e.g. C mode, TeX mode, etc. Of course you have to get
it which can be painful if you don't want to ftp 8 meg of code.
>
>2. Is there a version of EDT that can run under UNIX 4.2(or3) BSD?
>
There is an emulator of EDT that runs under GNU Emacs. This
comes with the latest dist. I think
>3. Is VMS a better environment for electronic publishing than UNIX? (I.e.,
>fuller support, more powerful tools).
I have found that everything VMS has, UNIX has, plus a lot more.
It is much easier to do development under unix. It really
surprises me that anyone would go looking for EDT, it is really
one of the poorer editors that I have seen.
VMS has Digital standard runoff,TeX & WPS, Unix has troff (like
DSR except much better) and TeX. I have yet to talk to anyone
that didn't hate WPS, so that leaves TeX, which you have on UNIX
I think TeX is the best of all of them, this also is free and runs
on lots (UNIX, VMS, TOPS-20, IBM-PC, Mac, Amiga) of machines.
The only reason to use EDT on unix is if you don't have time to
learn GNU or vi. Right now I use eve under vms and find it
acceptable (You just about have to customize it, the way it
comes is quite obnoxious, so don't be discouraged)
--robert
--
CSNET: robert%jimi.cs.unlv.edu@relay.cs.net
UUCP: {sdcrdcf,ihnp4}!otto!jimi!robert
seismo!unrvax!tahoe!jimi!robert
--
CSNET: robert%jimi.cs.unlv.edu@relay.cs.net
UUCP: {sdcrdcf,ihnp4}!otto!jimi!robert
seismo!unrvax!tahoe!jimi!robert
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<397@jimi.cs.unlv.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!otto!jimi!robertReferences:
<241@tellab5.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!otto!jimi!robert From: robert@jimi.cs.unlv.edu (Robert Cray) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: edt or vi? Message-ID: <397@jimi.cs.unlv.edu> Date: Thu, 11-Dec-86 01:31:32 EST Article-I.D.: jimi.397 Posted: Thu Dec 11 01:31:32 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Jan-87 02:45:36 EST References: <241@tellab5.UUCP> Reply-To: robert@jimi.cs.unlv.edu (Robert Cray) Organization: University of Nevada, Las Vegas Lines: 59 Keywords: EDT sucks