🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1244@ucbcad.berkeley.edu>, faustus@ucbcad.berkeley.edu (Wayne A. Christopher) writes:
> The one thing I've heard that troff is better than TeX with is tables -- 
> I've used tbl a lot and it seems to work fine, but others who have used
> TeX's table-making facilities complain that they are not very convenient.
> (Are there any good macro packages for tables in TeX?)

I agree that TeX's table-making is a little complicated, but I think LaTeX
may offer some solutions (I have just got the LaTeX book and have not really
look into it yet!). However, with the table-making in TeX, I think one has
more options to play with.


> Other than that,
> it's just inertia...  Also, what sort of self-respecting UNIX hack would
> use a text formatter written in Pascal?  :-)
> 

But... but... there is now a version of TeX in C (maybe more than one
version; TeX in Common C and the Unix version of TeX is also in C [standard
C?])....


I learned TeX first on a VMS machine then moved (not by choice) to a Unix
machine having no TeX, but troff. I still like TeX over troff. Even the
macro files in TeX is more readable than troff's - to me anyways (:-)

... Peter/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Kuo                    Bitnet (VMS address)    : KUO@SASK
Accelerator Laboratory              (UUCP address)   : "skatter!kuo@sask.uucp"
(a.k.a. The Beam Warehouse)
Univ. of Saskatchewan          uucp (unix address)   : !ihnp4!sask!skatter!kuo
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan             (Bitnet address) : !ihnp4!sask.BITNET!kuo
CANADA  S7N 0W0
Tel. (306) 966-6059

[Disclaimer: all the standard stuff.]