🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.text
Article #3328

TeX -- for academics only?

#3328
From: kbb
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1987 18:12
20 lines
1505 bytes
TeX was indeed designed by an academician. But it certainly isn't out of
the question for professional typesetting. I've seen some other
typesetting languages from companies in the field (e.g., Compugraphic)
and TeX is easier to use (with appropriate macros), and produces better
output than whatever else I've seen. The input to TeX can look like just
about anything (including troff or whatever), so just because plain TeX
has some weird ideas about what to call things (\baselineskip???) or how
things should be types (\centerline{...}???) don't think that makes TeX
hard to learn for people used to other systems. And perhaps the best
thing about it is that everything is public domain -- the source code,
the file formats, ...

In the latest TUGboat, a French group described a table package they had
done. I've never used it, though.

LaTeX isn't ``essentially'' a macro package for TeX, it _is_ a macro
package for TeX.

Karl   kbb%cs.brown.edu@csnet-relay (from Arpa)
       {decvax,ihnp4}!brunix!kbb
Technical Details
Message-ID: <11807@brunix.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!necntc!adelie!mirror!rayssd!brunix!nancy!kbb

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!necntc!adelie!mirror!rayssd!brunix!nancy!kbb
From: kbb@nancy.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: TeX -- for academics only?
Message-ID: <11807@brunix.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Jan-87 13:12:27 EST
Article-I.D.: brunix.11807
Posted: Mon Jan 26 13:12:27 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Jan-87 05:38:45 EST
Sender: root@brunix.UUCP
Reply-To: kbb%cs.brown.edu@csnet-relay
Lines: 20