Re: Summary of Macintosh TeX responses

Article View: comp.text

Article #3336

#3336

From: gdvsmit
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1987 13:51

8 lines
980 bytes

In article <121500001@iuvax> pwp@iuvax.indiana.EDU writes:
>Since TeX is in the public domain, I find it hard to believe that there is
>only one legal TeX for the Mac. Perhasps MacTeX is the name of one such TeX.

My statement was: "there is only one legal MacTeX".  I did not say there is
only one legal TeX for the Mac.  So you're right, the company in question
obtained the legal rights to call their product MacTeX and no one else
may do the same.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8421@watrose.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!watnot!watrose!gdvsmit

References: <12880003@acf4.UUCP> <121500001@iuvax>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!watnot!watrose!gdvsmit
From: gdvsmit@watrose.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: Summary of Macintosh TeX responses
Message-ID: <8421@watrose.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Jan-87 08:51:47 EST
Article-I.D.: watrose.8421
Posted: Fri Jan 30 08:51:47 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 04:21:47 EST
References: <12880003@acf4.UUCP> <121500001@iuvax>
Reply-To: gdvsmit@watrose.UUCP (Riel Smit)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message