Article View: comp.text
Article #3342Re: Why Troff ?
From: lien
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1987 07:12
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1987 07:12
38 lines
1721 bytes
1721 bytes
From: Yao-Nan Lien <lien>
Superiority is not sufficient to have people to choose a
particular typesetting tool or to switch from one to another.
I am tire of hearing that
"TeX is better, so you should switch to Tex "
Who is going to rewrite my thousands of Shell scripts and papers
written in past 5 years? Those Shell scripts are a mix of
troff, ex, sed, awk, ....etc. I don't even know can TeX support such an
environment or not. What I mean support is the capability of mixing
with other UNIX tools to have a NEW tool quickly by a noraml user.
Could we list out the criteria to evaluate a typesetting tool
from the users' point of view ( NOT SYSTEM PEOPLE's !) first.
Then, give adequate weight to each item we listed for different
types of users. THEN, evaluate these tools against these
criteria.
PS.
There is an article in ACM computing survey ( 3 or 4 year back)
doing an interesting evaluation.
------------------------------------------------------------
Yao-Nan Lien
Department of Computer and Information Science
Ohio State University
2036, Neil Ave. Mall
Columbus, Ohio 43210-1277
Tel 614 292-5236
CSNet : lien@ohio-state.CSNET
Arpa : lien@ohio-state.arpa
UUCP : {cbosgd, ihnp4}!osu-eddie!lien
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3016@osu-eddie.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!osu-eddie!lienShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!osu-eddie!lien From: lien@osu-eddie.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Why Troff ? Message-ID: <3016@osu-eddie.UUCP> Date: Fri, 30-Jan-87 02:12:40 EST Article-I.D.: osu-eddi.3016 Posted: Fri Jan 30 02:12:40 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 07:52:10 EST Sender: lien@osu-eddie.UUCP Organization: Ohio State Univ, Computer Science Department Lines: 38